Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Authoritarianism --- Arab Spring, 2010 --- -Islam and politics --- Africa, North --- Politics and government

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Authoritarianism is on the march-and so is dystopian fiction. In the brave new twenty-first century, young-adult series like The Hunger Games and Divergent have become blockbusters; after Donald Trump's election, two dystopian classics, 1984 and The Handmaid's Tale, skyrocketed to the New York Times best-seller list. This should come as no surprise: dystopian fiction has a lot to say about the perils of terrible government in real life.In Survive and Resist, Amy L. Atchison and Shauna L. Shames explore the ways in which dystopian narratives help explain how real-world politics work. They draw on classic and contemporary fiction, films, and TV shows-as well as their real-life counterparts-to offer funny and accessible explanations of key political concepts. Atchison and Shames demonstrate that dystopias both real and imagined help bring theories of governance, citizenship, and the state down to earth. They emphasize nonviolent resistance and change, exploring ways to challenge and overcome a dystopian-style government. Fictional examples, they argue, help give us the tools we need for individual survival and collective resistance. A clever look at the world through the lenses of pop culture, classic literature, and real-life events, Survive and Resist provides a timely and innovative approach to the fundamentals of politics for an era of creeping tyranny.

Dystopias in literature. --- Authoritarianism in literature. --- Politics and literature. --- Fiction --- Dystopias. --- Authoritarianism. --- Popular culture --- World politics --- Culture, Popular --- Mass culture --- Pop culture --- Popular arts --- Communication --- Intellectual life --- Mass society --- Recreation --- Culture --- Political science --- Authority --- Anti-utopias --- Utopias --- Metafiction --- Novellas (Short novels) --- Novels --- Stories --- Literature --- Novelists --- Literature and politics --- History and criticism. --- Political aspects. --- Philosophy --- Political aspects --- Dystopias in literature --- Authoritarianism in literature --- Politics and literature --- 82-313.2 --- Dystopias --- Authoritarianism --- 82-313.2 Utopische roman --- Utopische roman --- History and criticism

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

National governments are increasingly sharing the stage with many other forms of empowered social actors and authoritative players. Worldwide, alongside governmental bureaucracies, we witness the proliferation of non-for-profit and voluntary associations, business organizations and corporations, civic action committees and political parties, as well as celebrities and cultural icons. Importantly, whether they are individual- and collective social actors, these various actors are bestowed with the legitimate authority to speak their mind, act on their agenda, and influence the course of social progress. How might we conceptualize the role of such empowered social actors?This compilation of research and commentary gathers a range of institutional perspectives investigating what the devolution of state power and the so-called democratization of social action means for the nature of authority and how the multiplicity and variety of social actors impacts societies worldwide, extending from focus on agents to actors to actorhood.

Sociology of organization --- Organizational sociology --- Authority --- Political science --- Authoritarianism --- Consensus (Social sciences) --- Organizational research --- Research --- E-books --- Research. --- Social Science --- Organizational theory & behaviour. --- Sociology --- General.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"Were the countries of Europe the only ones that were "early modern"? Was Asia's early modernity cut short by colonialism? Scholars examining early modern Eurasia have not yet fully explored the relationships between absolute rule and political modernization in the highly contested early modern world. Using a comparative perspective that places Chŏngjo, king of Korea from 1776 to 1800, in context with other Korean kings and with contemporary Chinese and European rulers, Christopher Lovins examines the shifting balance of power in Korea in favor of the crown at the expense of the aristocracy during the early modern period. Lovins is the first in English-language scholarship to analyze the recently discovered collection of 297 private letters written by Chŏngjo himself. These letters were undoubtedly a vital channel of communication outside of official court historians' scrutiny, since private meetings between the king and his ministers were forbidden by custom. Royal politics played out in an arena of subtle communication, with court officials trying to read the king's unstated, elliptically hinted at intentions and the king trying to suggest what he wanted done while maintaining plausible deniability. Through close analysis of both official records and private letters, including Chŏngjo's "secret letters," Lovins shows that, in contrast to previous assumptions, the late eighteenth-century Korean monarchs were not weak and ineffective but instead in the process of building an absolutist polity."--Provided by publisher.

Despotism --- Absolutism --- Autocracy --- Tyranny --- Authoritarianism --- Dictatorship --- Totalitarianism --- History. --- Chŏngjo, --- Yi Chŏngjo, --- Yi Sŏng, --- Yi Hongjae, --- Yi, Sŏng, --- Yi, Hongjae, --- Yi, Hong-jae, --- Chŏngjo Taewang, --- Jungjo, --- 正祖, --- 정조, --- Korea --- Kings and rulers --- Politics and government --- History

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Education --- Fascism. --- Marxist criticism. --- Criticism, Marxist --- Marxian criticism --- Marxist literary criticism --- Communism and literature --- Communist aesthetics --- Criticism --- Neo-fascism --- Authoritarianism --- Collectivism --- Corporate state --- National socialism --- Synarchism --- Totalitarianism --- Social aspects --- United States --- Social conditions --- Economic conditions --- Politics and government --- Race relations. --- Ethnic relations. --- Race question